Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Person Choices, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area regarding accessory in the person mating. Breakdown of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Websites paradox reviewed. Record from Societal Circumstances, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A personal tech you to reduces public engagement and you will emotional better-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The advantages of confident illusions: Idealization while the design of pleasure inside the personal relationship
Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Count, timing, and time of marriages and you may divorces. Most recent Society Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data off closeness, hobbies, and you will relationship: Testing brand new assumptions of triangular concept of like. Emotional Reports, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impression best on the carrying out bad: Public reviews inside romantic relationship. Diary regarding Identity and you can Public Therapy, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Journal out-of Personality and you will Social Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge away from personal competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can glamorous solutions: This new progressed psychology from relationships restoration. Development and People Conclusion, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential investigation away from dispute and you can agreement during the upset and you will nondistressed relationship people. Journal out-of Asking and Clinical Therapy, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation on the web: What is the big appeal? Record of Social Items, 58(1), 9�29.
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-testing aim from inside the close relationship: A model of around the globe enhancement and you may particular confirmation. In P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents regarding the examination of partners communications (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist thread from the contact of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Routine, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh societal overseeing system: Enhanced susceptibility so you can societal cues because a transformative reaction to social difference. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest societal outcast: Ostracism, social different, getting rejected, and you may bullying (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Therapy Force.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Globally and particular relational designs from the exposure to societal relationships. Record regarding Identification and you may Social Mindset, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and suggestions seeking from inside the personal matchmaking. Identification and you may Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. R korean dating website., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can particular connection representations within the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Log Away from Public And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you may relationship repair systems. Inside the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close relationship: Maintenance and you may enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection really effect certainly spouses because a purpose of the newest resemblance within their mutual feel. Identification And Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Effects of salience from extrinsic advantages on liking and enjoying. Record off Identity and you can Public Psychology, 38(3), 453�460.